If you look up the etymology of the word dyslexia, you’ll discover a humorous error. The word is composed of two roots: dys, meaning difficult, and lexia, meaning speech. Although many people with dyslexia do struggle to find the exact words to express themselves, they have no more difficulty speaking than the average person! It seems the expert who coined the term meant to describe a difficulty with reading but accidentally mixed up his Greek and Latin roots! But understanding the meaning of the word brings up an important point.
Every human being on planet earth, no matter how intelligent they are, finds certain things more difficult than other things. They call the easy things their strengths and the difficult things their weaknesses. Let’s use the subjects taught in most schools as an example: math, language arts, science, art, and physical education. I tend to be strongest in math, science and physical education, but weaker in language arts and art. Maybe you can read books ’til the cows come home, but you can’t throw a football to save your life.
We’ve all heard people say things like, “sports aren’t really my thing,” or “math isn’t really her strength.” Sometimes we just mean there’s no interest in the subject. But more often than not, we mean there’s a major weakness involved. If you tell people that math or sports aren’t really your thing, they get it… not everyone is good at math or sports. But if you tell someone that reading isn’t really your thing, they just assume you don’t enjoy reading. Why don’t they assume that you aren’t good at reading just like some people aren’t good at math or sports? I think it’s because there’s a huge stigma involved with reading. Why?
Up until now, modern man has found that the distribution of knowledge is most easily accomplished through the written word. Want to learn how to do something? Go to the library and get a book or read about it online. The easiest way to cheaply pass on knowledge is via the written word. Public and private schools have capitalized on this and have traditionally used the written word as their main means of educating the masses. Essentially, in this country, knowledge is gained through reading. When you combine this fact with the assumption that intelligence is based on how much a person knows, the logical conclusion people draw is that if you can’t read, you can’t gain knowledge, so you must be dumb!
In this country, reading provides knowledge. If you can’t read, public and private schools can’t figure out how to teach you! But consider this for a moment. What if you were enrolled in a school where you were not allowed to acquire any information unless you first caught a ball. The teacher would throw you a ball, and if you caught it, he would tell you some new bit of knowledge. If you dropped the ball, you’d be out of luck. Now your “intelligence” is dependent on your athleticism. Or what if you had to answer a math problem before the teacher would tell you who King Tut was? Better hope you’re good at math or people are gonna assume you’re just dumb all around!
When you look at it that way, it becomes obvious that it’s just as ridiculous to consider someone unintelligent because they struggle to read, as it is to consider someone unintelligent because they struggle in sports. But if quickly and consistently catching a ball was a requirement for the acquisition of knowledge, I can assure you parents would hire coaches to improve their child’s skill. And with the right coaching, the child’s skill would improve. In the same way, if a dyslexic child is taught to read by the right coach, their reading will improve. And I can appreciate the fact that reading has become an integral part of life in the modern world. But does it have to be as integral as we force it to be? I don’t think so.
Before the digital age, when printing presses were our only option, being an excellent reader was quite essential to the acquisition of certain kinds of knowledge. But now we have the ability to record everything on audio. And artificial intelligence can transcribe the spoken word with amazing accuracy! We live in the golden age for dyslexics! Transitioning schools to Orton-Gillingham based approaches to teaching reading, embracing accommodations, and changing our thinking about how knowledge is acquired, can resolve the stigma.